WISH-TV 8 | Indiana pensions: A state secret

Jim Tobin, President of Taxpayers United for America, was featured in WISH-TV 8‘s two-part investigation on Indiana’s growing pension problem. You can see the first part here.


Updated: Wednesday, 16 Nov 2011, 9:03 AM EST
Published : Tuesday, 15 Nov 2011, 11:00 PM EST

INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) – During the last fiscal year, Indiana’s public retirement system paid out more than $2.3 billion in benefits to nearly 120,000 Hoosiers. But, after months of investigation, I-Team 8 found out some could be taking home much bigger payouts than many of us could imagine.
With so much money in play, and the health of our system at risk, 24-Hour News 8 spent more than two months working to find out who’s cashing in. The results of that investigation showed huge estimated public pension payouts in states across the country going to everyone from university administrators and professors to state hospital administrators, legislators, judges, prosecutors and public officials.
In neighboring Illinois alone, a recent investigation by the Better Government Association (BGA) and Chicago based Taxpayers United of America (TUA) shows more than 10 percent of retired politicians have already collected over $1 million in pension payments each. TUA says it uncovered government records showing 5,294 government retirees in Illinois who currently receive annual pension payments of over $100,000.
After exposing serious concerns about a shortfall of nearly $14 billion in the funds used to pay for the retirements of public workers in Indiana, I-Team 8 wanted to see if some Hoosier retirees receiving similar pension payments here too. So, we spent months working sources and combing through documents to find out.
Almost immediately, we hit a legal roadblock.
A VEIL OF SECRECY
“We are only allowed to give information regarding a person’s name and their years of service in the fund. Anything else is prohibited by law for us to release,” replied Jeff Hutson, Communications Director for the Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) to I Team 8’s request for documents outlining pension payments to public employees and officials in Indiana.
“We’re prevented from providing specific information with—say–a specific individual’s name. Our job is to follow the law,” Hutson said.
That law is House Enrolled Act 1285, passed by the Indiana General Assembly and signed by former Governor Joe Kernan (D) in 2004. At the time, Kernan said the measure would help protect public employees from having their private information used by criminals. But, it also left taxpayers with no way of tracking billions of dollars in benefits paid out from the state’s publicly funded retirement system every year.
“The law currently makes so much of the information secret that it’s virtually pointless to look at,” said Dr. Tony Fargo, Indiana University Associate Professor of Journalism, who teaches a continuing legal education course at the Indiana Statehouse for legislators, legislative employees and state agency attorneys.
Asked by 24-Hour News 8’s Troy Kehoe if that veil of secrecy surrounding pension payments was troubling, Fargo quickly nodded.
“It does,” he said. “From a public access standpoint, anything that involves the use of public money and the word secret is problematic. It does send a clear message that they don’t believe we deserve to know this type of information. And, I don’t think–from a public policy standpoint–that’s a compelling argument. At a time when the public polls are telling us that people’s trust of public institutions is at an all time low, this is probably not a good message to be sending.”
I Team 8 traveled to Chicago to find out just how common that type of policy is in other states.
“That depends where you’re looking,” said Jim Tobin, a former economics professor and founder of Chicago based Taxpayers United of America, one of the nation’s largest taxpayer advocacy groups. “I can tell you that can get that information real fast in Illinois, but not in Indiana. We started [looking up information on public pension payouts] in Illinois, and we found out that the highest pension was $414,470 a year. And it goes up three percent a year.”
But, as Tobin and his research team from the non-profit Family Taxpayers Foundation began digging into pension data from other Midwest states, they found reliable information much harder to come by.
“Indiana’s been the most difficult state so far to gather pension information. They won’t give us the pensions at all,” Tobin said.
And, Indiana’s not the only state keeping pension payout information confidential.
According to a recent survey by the National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA), at least 16 other states deny public access to pension data altogether, and as many as five more only release limited data on payouts. In total, I Team 8 found billions of dollars in public pension funding being distributed in states across the country without any oversight by the taxpayers footing the bill.
But, that hasn’t stopped TUA and other taxpayer reform groups from estimating what payouts might be in states that limit access to pension information.
CALCULATING POTENTIAL PAYMENTS
Using publicly available data showing employees’ current salaries and at least 30 years of
public service at retirement (assumed to be age 55), Tobin’s researchers calculated potential annual and lifetime payouts. Their estimates do not include employee contributions or changes in value due to market fluctuations, and assume a 1.5 percent cost of living adjustment per year. It’s not an exact science, but Tobin says it can give taxpayers an idea of where at least some of their money might eventually go.
In Wisconsin, for example, Tobin says his researchers estimate at least 100 current public employees could receive total pension payouts of at least $3 million each over a typical 30-year retirement. In Missouri, Tobin estimated one public employee could get even more.
“His estimated total lifetime pension payout will be $4,742,391,” Tobin said. “And it’s estimated because they won’t give us the pensions in Missouri.”
In Indiana, I Team 8 was able to acquire data from the state showing pension payment averages.
In order to qualify for most pension benefits in Indiana, a member must complete at least 10 years of service. In some positions, that service requirement is as high as 15 years.
According to INPRS actuarial reports, the average public pensioner in Indiana only gets about $24,000 per year, though most take home far less. The average retired public school teacher in Indiana gets a $17,292 annual pension. Those enrolled in the Public Employee Retirement Fund (PERF)—from city and county workers to university professors and state employees–get an average of $7,470 per year. And retired legislators receive an average of $6,846 per year.
That average is boosted by police officers, prosecutors and firefighters, who receive an average of between $21,000 and $24,000 and retired judges, who receive an average of $66,180 in annual pension benefits, according to data supplied by INPRS.
But, our requests for data on individual pension payouts were again denied.
So, I Team 8 asked Taxpayers United of America and the Family Taxpayer Foundation to estimate what pension payments might be for current public employees in Indiana, as well. Both groups said privacy laws here made that a trickier task than in other states.
But, they were able to estimate what some of Indiana’s most highly paid current employees might get when they retire. Like many other states, most at the top of the list are employees of the state’s public universities.
TUA estimates Indiana University basketball coach Tom Crean’s current $600,000 annual salary could result in a $198,000 annual pension, if Crean were to continue working for the state for 30 total years before he retired. If that were to happen, Tobin estimates more than $7.4 million would be paid out over a 30 year retirement, including a two percent cost of living adjustment per year.
Also among the top five on Tobin’s estimated list are the current presidents of Purdue University, Indiana University and Ball State University, as well as the athletic director at Indiana University. If each worked for the state for 30 years and retired at the age of 55 at their current salary, Tobin estimates each would receive an annual payout between $117,612 and $148,500 when they retired, in addition to a single lump sum payout of between $302,940 and $382,500.
Using the same assumptions of service and salary, TUA also estimates at least five Indiana state hospital administrators could receive annual pensions of between $63,545 and $80,384 upon their retirement.
Because of Indiana’s law regarding pension privacy, TUA says it can’t accurately estimate the pensions of other former highly paid state, county or municipal employees who have already retired.
While not all on TUA’s list of estimations will likely put in 30 years of service to the state—thus reducing their estimated annual payouts, in some cases, drastically—Tobin says the figures are designed to illustrate a point.
“If we don’t reform the pensions, there’s going to be a collapse in the system. And, this is why they don’t want us to see the pensions. This is why they don’t make them available,” he said.
Even more concerning, Tobin said, is the practice of what’s become known as “double dipping”–a legal loophole where retired public employees can be re-hired in a new position, allowing them to collect both a pension and a salary at the same time.
According to state records obtained by I Team 8, at least 190 elected officials in state, county and municipal governments are double dipping in Indiana every year, receiving an average of nearly $13,000 in retirement benefits each.
None are actually retired.
But, because of the state’s privacy law, who they are remains a mystery.
Asked what that suggested to him, Tobin shrugged his shoulders.
“It suggests to me they’re trying to hide something,” he said.
LEGISLATING SECRECY
I Team 8 took those questions over confidentiality to the latest meeting of the General Assembly’s newly formed Pension Management Oversight Commission (PMOC). Most lawmakers we spoke with there said the state’s confidentiality
law regarding pension payment information is there for a reason.
“There is a lot that does deserve to be private,” said Rep. David Niezgodski (D-South Bend). “I don’t have a problem with people knowing what is put into someone’s account or what percentage of their pay might be matched by the employer. I don’t necessarily know that, for every single employee, that you should be able to say this person has that many dollars in his or her retirement account. Sometimes those things can be used inappropriately, and I think to some degree, you have to protect the integrity of the individual.”
“I’m not sure it’s privacy as much as it’s the disclosure and the means by which government pensions operate by different accounting rules than private pensions,” said Sen. Greg Walker (R-Columbus), who chairs the PMOC committee. “In terms of private balances, I’m not sure that is acceptable information. But, I will say that any contributions going to any elected official or public employee in any sense, I think that information should have full disclosure.”
Another PMOC member is now working to make that happen. In each of the last 3 years, Hendricks County Rep. Jeff Thompson (R-Lizton) has filed legislation at the Statehouse that would lend additional transparency to pension payouts.
“From my point of view, we [should] do the taxpayer portion. That should be public. What did the public put in? They have a right to know for that part,” Thompson said.
When asked if the state is trying to hide something by legislating confidentiality over pension payments, as Tobin asserts, Thompson shook his head.
“In my view, not,” he said. “But, I still believe the portion that taxpayers fund should be made public. The way the bill is drafted, the gain or loss in investment due to market change will not be public. Any rollover amount under the current plan will not be public. So, really it’s just the taxpayer dollars we’re going to talk about reporting. Taxpayers [have a right to know that].”
TRACKING THE SYSTEM
In states where that information is public, taxpayers have been able to track some high profile pension payments in recent weeks, like those going to former Penn State Coach Jerry Sandusky. According to pension documents obtained by The Patriot News in Harrisburg , Pennsylvania, Sandusky continues to collect an annual state pension, in addition to a lump sum payment that was paid out when he retired as a full time coach in 1999. Charges that Sandusky sexually abused eight young boys are unlikely to stop those checks, though any potential felony conviction could result in forced forfeiture future pension payments, the newspaper reported.
Requests for documents pertaining to pension payments for former Penn State head coach Joe Paterno have not been released yet, the newspaper reported.
Forfeiture of state pension funding is also likely for former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who was convicted on federal corruption charges earlier this year. The Associated Press reports, Illinois officials said in October that they plan to deny Blagojevich’s $65,000-a-year pension, just as they did to his predecessor, former Gov. George Ryan, who also was convicted of corruption.
But Blagojevich would be due a refund of more than $129,000 he paid into the fund as a state legislator and later governor. And he’s entitled in the future to at least $13,000 annually from his six-year stint in Congress.
In Indiana, similar records of state related pension payments from both cases would be confidential.
Thompson says he believes that should change, but his efforts to do so have not been met with action by the legislature. Each of the bills he filed never received a hearing in the House Rules Committee.
Asked why he thinks the measure has stalled out, Thompson thought for a moment.
“Well, my take is, about a decade ago, there was some reports made public about the amount in someone’s pension fund. And, there’s still some soreness over that,” he said.
Some aren’t convinced that’s the real reason. They say it’s because lawmakers are the ones who benefit from hiding the information over payouts.
A RIGHT TO KNOW?
“There really isn’t any good reason to keep this information secret,” said Julia Vaughn, Policy Director for Common Cause Indiana. “It’s not a private company. This is our government. This is the State of Indiana. This is the citizens funding these pensions. We have a right to know.”
Vaughn says she’s concerned that the law was passed so quickly, with what she says was little input from the public.
“The General Assembly, when they want to, can be extremely swift to act and can do so without the public being able to find out what’s going on. And, I think that’s what happened. They knew that this was something the public wouldn’t support, and it would be unpopular, and there’s really no good reason to do it. So, [they said] let’s rush it through and do it behind closed doors.
Vaughn says Common Cause and other grassroots groups will be working

to back Thompson’s proposal in the upcoming legislative session. She believes added pressure could force the legislature to act.
“It’s difficult in the General Assembly to be a maverick–to go against the grain, to do something the leadership doesn’t want done. And, you have to believe that’s what’s happening to efforts like Rep. Thompson’s. If there is a big enough outcry from the grassroots, from people all across the state, this could be changed,” she said.
Thompson, for his part, isn’t quite sure what form that push will take. But, he remains committed to the cause.
“I’m an optimist,” he said. “It may not happen in this session. It may be in 2016. It may be somebody else doing it. But, I think someday it will change.”
I Team 8 took the results of our investigation to Governor Mitch Daniels (R) to ask if he would support a change to the law.
“I’m very open to idea,” he responded in a statement. “We always must be careful to strive for a balance between personal privacy and public transparency, but we generally tilt toward transparency. We’d give it a close look.”
In response to I Team 8’s investigation, INPRS also agreed Tuesday to release data on average payouts. According to those documents, fewer than one percent of all current public retirees receive annual pension payments in excess of $36,000, and no current INPRS recipients receive annual defined benefit payments (funded solely by taxpayers) in excess of $100,000. Still, state data shows at least five current INPRS retirees do get more than $100,000 in annual payments through a combination of pension and annuity savings accounts (paid in part by the recipient) or personal retirement accounts.
However, unless Indiana’s privacy law is changed, who they are will remain a mystery.

WISH-TV 8 | Can Indiana keep its pension promise?

Jim Tobin, President of Taxpayers United for America, was interviewed by WISH-TV 8 on Indiana’s growing pension problem.

Updated: Friday, 11 Nov 2011, 6:27 AM EST
Published : Thursday, 10 Nov 2011, 11:00 PM EST
Troy Kehoe
INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) – Nearly half-a-million Hoosiers are counting on getting a state pension when they retire. It’s a promise Indiana made to everyone from teachers and police officers to city snow plow drivers and county clerks. But, a two-month I Team 8 investigation uncovered serious concerns over the funding used to issue those pension checks, and some say you could be forced to help pick up the bill to fix it.
Indiana’s retirement system is one of the largest in the country, with assets approaching $26 billion. With so much money at stake, I Team 8 wanted to find out just how healthy and reliable those funds are.
After months of investigation, we found the answer comes down to simple math, and an equation that’s making a growing number of baby-boomers increasingly apprehensive.
Not Making the Grade
Standing in front of the blackboard inside her classroom at Shortridge High School, Alene Smith is fulfilling a lifelong dream every day.
“I teach law and court process, and I also coach track. This is my 23rd year of teaching,” she told 24-Hour News8, smiling from ear to ear.
“Teaching is a calling,” Smith continued. “Last year, I said this is the most fun I’ve ever had. This year, I’m saying this is the most fun I’ve ever had. It truly is a calling. It’s just such a great profession!”
It’s supposed to be a great profession with a great retirement plan. In addition to various annuity options, most public employees have a state funded pension—funded solely by taxpayers, and given to retirees with at least 10 years of service.
But, I Team 8 has found the fund used to pay for some teachers’ pensions isn’t making the grade.
It’s a warning signal pension experts like IUPUI’s Dr. Craig Hartzer have been studying for years. Hartzer ran Indiana’s Public Employee Retirement Fund (PERF) for more than 20 years; before it was combined with the state’s six other retirement funds in 2010. All seven funds are now overseen by the newly formed Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS).
“Five years ago when I left [PERF], it might have been around $8 billion in unfunded liabilities. Today it might be [closer to] $15 billion,” Hartzer said.
Asked if those figures set off a new set of alarm bells, Hartzer nodded.
“If I were a retired teacher, and I had to depend on the Indiana General Assembly to make appropriations out of the general fund to cover my retirement check, I’d be worried,” he said.
That’s because–for 75 years—teachers used what the state called a “pay-as-you-go” pension system. While teacher pension payments were guaranteed by the state, no money was set aside through their paychecks or from their schools in order to make their payments. Lawmakers simply paid each year’s teacher pension bill through the state budget. That changed in 1996, when the General Assembly set up a new fund which accumulates money for future payouts–like other public employees.
According to the latest INPRS actuarial report, that new teachers retirement fund—now known as TRF 96–contains 94.7 percent of the funding it needs to pay out all of its members, though many of them won’t retire for decades. But, for teachers like Smith who were hired before 1996, the state’s “pension bank” is much more dire. Those same figures show the “Pre-96 TRF funded at only 33.1 percent–about $11 billion short of its obligations.
How could that happen?
“We are looking at dire straits because certain people in the legislature–or the entire legislature–didn’t do their job right,” said Rep. David Niezgodski (D-South Bend). “I hate to say it, but I think promises were made and promises were not kept.”
Still, despite that lack of funding, more than 45,000 baby boomer teachers hired under the “old” system have already cashed in on their promised benefits, and nearly 25,000 more will likely do the same within the next 20 years. That’s only increasing the shortage.
A New Budget Battle
At the latest meeting of the General Assembly’s Pension Management Oversight Commission, its Chairman Sen. Greg Walker (R-Columbus) said the growing problem could put future state budgets in jeopardy.
“No, I’m not comfortable,” he said when asked if enough was being done to address the issue. “I think we’ve got some good minds looking at this, but our current state across the nation is for some funds to be in default. There have been deferred payments over the years where it’s time to pay the piper. I don’t want to see Indiana get into that same position.”
Neither does Smith.
“It does [worry me],” she said. “Because, I’m one of those teachers that will be retiring in the next 10-15 years, it is a bit frightening.”
And, not just for teachers.
I Team 8 put all seven of Indiana’s retirement funds under the microscope, and found most are thought of as “healthy.”
“Generally speaking, the funds are in very solid condition, ahead of where most funds are

in the nation in terms of funded status,” said INPRS Communications Director Jeff Hutson.
With the exception of teachers–they’re way ahead–for everyone from police officers and firefighters to snow plow drivers, county clerks. Lawmakers aren’t far behind. Take away those baby-boomer teachers from the mix, and Indiana’s retirement funds are 87.5 percent funded. That puts the state in the top ten, with the most money socked away to make pension payments, according to a recent Pew Center for the States study. According to that study, the national average for all funds is 78 percent.
But, add in the Pre-96 TRF fund, and Indiana’s total fund balance drops to just 64.5 percent, leaving the state without a single penny to pay nearly one-third of its eventual retirees.
And, while the other funds are better off than many other states, none has enough money to pay all the members it will eventually owe. Funds used to pay the retirements of judges and prosecutors are of particular concern, as they currently list funding statuses of only 66.5 percent and 53.3 percent, respectively.
Some say the numbers should serve as a call to action.
“If we don’t reform the pensions, there’s going to be a collapse in the system,” said Jim Tobin, Founder and President of Chicago based Taxpayers United of America, one of the largest tax reform groups in the nation.
It’s a problem in other states too, leaving retirement systems across the country on the verge of disaster. The Pew Center estimates states are now more than $1 trillion short of their pension obligations, and only three states—Wisconsin, New York and Washington—have fully funded pension systems.
That’s where you come in.
Because legislators are using the state budget to bail out the underfunded Pre-96 TRF, and your taxes fund the state budget, you’ll have to pay to fix this.
Asked if there are concerns that will contribute to a budget crisis in the future, Niezgodski didn’t hesitate to respond.
“I would think so, if more steps aren’t taken,” he said.
Fixing the system
Indiana—like many other states—is left with three basic options in order to manage that crisis: default on promised payments, make drastic state budget cuts in combination with reserve funding, or raise taxes. The last of the options might not come solely from the state.
Because PERF saw the market value of its assets fall from a peak of nearly $17 billion in late 2007 to about $10 billion in early 2009, the Associated Press reported in September that cities, counties and other local governmental taxing bodies across Indiana will see an 11 percent average increase next year in what they have to toward their employees’ pension funds. While PERF’s market losses have since bounced back to around $15 billion, INPRS Director Steve Russo says higher contribution rates are needed to recover from the investments hit.
That could cause havoc in local budgets, already being hit by a loss in funding from the state’s new property tax caps. While the state of Indiana’s rate is expected to go up by about 23 percent in 2012, the city of Indianapolis will be forced to pay 43 percent more into the pension accounts of its current employees in 2012. That means the city will need to cut an additional $4 million from its upcoming budget, in addition to cuts already being made from its current $64 million budget deficit.
Even that, however, won’t make a complete fix.
A new study from the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity suggests every Hoosier household would have to pay an additional $300 in new taxes every year for the next 30 years simply to cover pension payments the state has already promised.
For those like Tobin, that’s an unacceptable burden.
“You’re going to have to work until you drop to pay for this,” he said. “Taxpayers should not be forced to do this, [when] we don’t get pensions in the private sector anymore.”
According to a recent report by the non-profit Manhattan Institute, only 15 percent of Americans are collecting a full private pension, and many companies have frozen or abandoned their pension plans altogether. Tobin says it’s a compelling argument as to why public pensions should be cut…or cut out.
But, state legislators on both sides of the aisle argue—ending the system all together would be unfair too.
“We just can’t throw it out because–well, we didn’t look at it sooner. So, now we’re going to have to hit the employee again? That’s not right,” Niezgodski said.
Walker argues higher public pensions should be viewed as a form of “compensation” for lower wages in the public sector than the private sector.
“I look at pensions as a tool of recruitment for quality talent,” he said.
Some argue pensions are an economic tool, too.
A 2008 study from Indiana University’s Kelly School of Business found approximately 90 percent of all Hoosier pension payments are re-spent within Indiana’s borders, creating more than 11,000 new jobs.
But, if taxes and cuts don’t close the gap, what will?
Some other states are taking a “hybrid” approach, floating proposals to raise mandatory retirement ages from 55 to 65 or even 67. In California, Governor Jerry Brown has called for public employees to raise their contributions to their own pension funds to 50 percent, essentially sharing the burden with state taxpayers.
In Indiana, the solution may be a shift, of sorts. Sen. Brent Waltz (R-Greenwood) plans to introduce a bill in the upcoming legislative session that would require all new hires of the state, schools or local governments, to have a so-called defined-contribution plan—similar to a 401(k)-style plan.
In a pension–or defined-benefit plan—taxpayers guarantee annual retirement benefits for public employees. Defined-contribution plans require workers to contribute to a retirement account, with employers typically offering a matching contribution.
Hartzer worries the switch could put public employees at risk of not having enough retirement savings.
“If you mandate a defined-contribution plan for all new employees, what you’ve done is shifted all the investment risk to the employees, and most employees are not very literate about investments,” he said.
But, Walker argues, with Indiana’s pension deficit growing every day, the state has to look at all its options.
“The government is in volatile investment times with rising benefit costs, rising health care costs and an increasing number of retirees every year,” Walker said. “We need to be talking about how we best protect employees of the state.”