Press

Jim Tobin, President of Taxpayers United for America, was quoted in an article from the Daily Herald on a convicted sex offender receiving a taxpayer-funded pension. 
Round Lake Beach taxpayers continue to provide a pension to a now-retired police officer who was convicted of molesting a 16-year-old girl while off duty and is on a law enforcement agency’s sex-offender registry.
Citing state law and a legal opinion, Round Lake Beach Mayor Richard Hill said the village determined it can’t end Leroy Kuffel’s pension. Hill said as far as he’s concerned, Kuffel’s case is closed.
“We don’t want to exhaust any more (village) funds,” Hill said of fighting the pension, alluding to previous legal costs related to Kuffel.
Kuffel’s pension went from $52,145 to $53,709 on Jan. 1 because he now receives 3 percent raises annually for the rest of his life, according to village records obtained through a Daily Herald Freedom of Information Act request.
Similar to a vast majority of states, Illinois law dictates no pension benefits will be paid to a retired police officer convicted of any felony relating to, arising from or in connection with the job. Round Lake Beach Village Administrator David Kilbane said officials have not pursued a change in the state’s pension forfeiture regulations to cover off-duty felonies in response to the Kuffel case.
Some states have strengthened pension forfeiture rules to address police and other government workers convicted of felonies while off duty. For example, police officers in Ohio lose their pensions if convicted of certain felonies, including a sex offense against a minor, under a law revised in 2008.
Government watchdog Jim Tobin, president of Taxpayers United of America’s Illinois branch, continues to voice concerns about public employee pensions that he contends should not top an average Social Security annual income of $22,000. He said not only are most state and municipal pensions too generous, but they also should be denied to police officers and other public employees convicted of felonies, regardless of whether the crime was job-related.
“You could be convicted of murder and still get a government pension, let alone molest a 16-year-old girl,” Tobin said. “Anything goes in Illinois.”
In Illinois, towns under 500,000 in population are required by state law to establish and administer a police pension fund that’s fed by a property tax levy. The fund, typically controlled by a local board, is for the benefit of police officers, surviving spouses, children and certain other dependents, according to state statute.
Hill said he’s split on his thoughts about Kuffel’s case — a pension earned for service on the job is just that.
“If it (the conviction) was connected to (Kuffel’s) job in any way, I’d like to see it taken away,” he said.
Kuffel, 55, of unincorporated Lake Villa Township, was a police officer for 29 years when he was charged with aggravated criminal sexual abuse in April 2009 and retired soon after his arrest.
He was convicted in a Lake County circuit court jury trial in May 2010 and he was sentenced to a 60-day local jail term and 30 months of additional confinement, with release only for work and sex-offender treatment.
At trial, the girl testified she became close to Kuffel as she was ending a relationship with his son. The teen said Kuffel brought her a pair of gym shoes, paid her wireless telephone bill and took her to dinner often.
Testimony showed the 16-year-old girl and Kuffel had sex twice in February 2009 and once in March of that year. She testified all three of the sexual encounters were at Kuffel’s house.
Speaking on behalf of his client, attorney Charles Smith of Waukegan said there was no testimony about Kuffel being on the job when the molestation occurred, so he has every right to the pension that required personal contributions of 9.91 percent of his salary.
“It had nothing to do with his duties as a police officer,” Smith said of Kuffel’s conviction.
Classified as a “predator” on the Lake County sheriff’s sex-offender website, Kuffel began receiving monthly payments based on a full-year starting pension of $48,060 on Sept. 20, 2009, according to Round Lake Beach records. His final salary was $66,290 when he retired.
As of July 1, Kuffel was old enough to qualify for the lifetime 3 percent raises annually, which gave him an extra $340 per month for the rest of 2012, Round Lake Beach police pension fund documents show.
Kuffel’s pension is projected at $70,079 when he reaches the common retirement age of 65 in 2022. He would top $1 million in total pension received in 2026.
If Kuffel were in Ohio, he wouldn’t collect a pension.
Under the revisions that became law in May 2008, the Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund’s forfeiture regulations were tightened. A criminal court judge must order a pension forfeiture if a law-enforcement officer is convicted of certain felony offenses.
Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund spokesman David Graham said a conviction for a sex crime against a minor would result in a cop losing the annual retirement payments. An affected officer is entitled to receive any personal contributions accumulated toward a pension.
Democratic Pennsylvania state Sen. Larry Farnese soon intends to reintroduce legislation that would prevent state and municipal employees, including police, from collecting pensions if convicted of a sex offense against a minor and ordered to register with authorities under Megan’s Law, said his spokesman, Cameron Kline.
Farnese’s proposal would amend Pennsylvania’s Public Employee Forfeiture Act. Kline said Farnese began pushing for the change in 2011 after a Philadelphia newspaper’s story about retired city police officers receiving pensions after convictions for felonies that included involuntary deviant sexual intercourse and unlawful contact with a minor.
“The main reason we introduced the (pension) legislation is as a deterrent, so this does not happen again,” Kline said.

Jim Tobin, President of Taxpayers United for America, was quoted in an article from the News Tribune on LaSalle County’s considered use of home rule.

OTTAWA — La Salle County Board members will begin discussion on reorganizing under “home rule” to give it broad taxation powers over the local sand mining industry.
The idea, which is only being whispered among some board members, involves a simple equation: several million tons of sand multiplied by a fee would presumably equal enough revenue to put the county in pristine financial shape.
But no county other than Cook County has passed a home rule referendum. In fact, it hasn’t been tried since 1976. And convincing the La Salle County electorate of giving its county board the taxing powers involved with home rule won’t be easy.
“At some point this year we will talk about it but I don’t think we have time to get it on the ballot (in April),” said county board chairman Jerry Hicks (D-Marseilles). “I need to look into what it’s all about. Our intent is not to increase the sin taxes or fuel taxes or anything of that nature. It’s to be specific in bringing in an income on frac sand mining unless the state legislature can do something to give us that authority.”
Constitutionally, home rule gives units of government freedom from state laws that bind or limit taxation authority.
For example, state law places a cap on how much a county can tax for particular line items such as the general fund. With home rule in place, those caps would not exist and the county could raise its levy at will without referendum. The same is true of sales taxes, selling bonds, and a multitude of other taxation and regulatory restrictions would be lifted as well.
Information on other counties opting for home rule status is limited because it hasn’t been attempted in decades, says Kelly Murray of Illinois Association of County Board Members and Commissioners.
“It’s always been a municipal issue,” Murray said. “Counties just haven’t sought home rule status in a long time so La Salle County might become a trendsetter.”
The proponents
Twice in the past decade researchers from Center for Governmental Studies at Northern Illinois University published studies that examined municipalities that had home rule status implemented.
The studies concluded that claims made by home rule opponents over the years that home rule would lead to the abuse of local taxing authority appear not to have been borne out in actual practice.
“There is no empirical evidence, from either the 2002 survey or from other studies made over the years, that suggests that home rule communities — even home rule communities which have levied property tax increases in excess of tax cap limitations — have experienced higher rates of property tax increases than have non-home rule communities,” the study stated.
“Instead, the evidence strongly suggests that, where home rule communities have used their broader taxing powers, they have done so to create a system of taxation more acceptable to local residents than a system based heavily on the use of property tax revenues.”
However, the potential of misuse of power through excessive taxation or overbearing regulatory authority as a result of home rule status will likely be a contentious issue among La Salle County voters.
The opposition
Ironically, a county in Illinois may only have home rule status if it has a chief executive officer elected at large and passes a home rule referendum.
La Salle County began electing its chairman at-large after a local activist group called La Salle County Landowners Association in 2006 led the ballot initiative to make the change. Back then, the effort was attempted to bust the stranglehold the local Democratic Party had on county politics and up the chances of reversing building codes and zoning ordinances.
Members of the Landowners have yet to make a statement publicly about how, or if, they will respond to the county’s home rule ballot drive.
Jim Tobin, President and founder of Taxpayers United of America, said several counties such as Peoria and De Kalb tried to pass home rule in the 1970s but each effort was soundly defeated by voters.
“It’s only been passed in Cook County and they’ve used it to batter their citizens with higher taxes,” Tobin said. “Home rule is home ruin. It is unlimited taxing powers. They can raise property taxes without limit or referendum. Issue bonds without limit — banks love home rule.”
Should La Salle County place on file a referendum to go for home rule, Tobin said Taxpayers United would get involved regardless of whether any local lobbying organizations get involved.
“We’ve successfully fought home rule efforts in many municipalities and we will get involved in La Salle County if they try to go for it,” he said.